With Google taking the place of memory, many worry that a vital faculty is eroding.What is assumed to be created by cyberspace is merely a(nother) example of said problem. Instead of goo-goo, read being the ob construct script.
I call it being an obot. The non-existent "food addiction" is an example of people making their experience fit the script. Their truth feels like the impostor. All realness is for them located with the cultists giving them orders. At its most extreme it becomes a kind of senility, which is pertinent given cultists continue to claim their construct is related to dementia.
Regardless of size, each person has to decide whether they wish to be an obot or to retain their own minds.
"Is the NHS-backed diet going to succeed when most others don't?" The reference is to re-emergence of starvation or VLCD, 800 calorie a day soups 'n' shakes diet. It's being sprung on diabetics, by people with proxy-anorexia, on account of potential desperation to temper their condition. Ob was supposed to fulfil this role, but is floundering, on account of its evident falseness.
Not that there isn't an intent to use this to starve off weight too, the acceptability of stomach amputation to achieve starvation is probably what has enabled both to be brought back.
Research, Medical and healthcare professionals, along with the rest of the white coated professions have always been the instigators and/or supporters of the starving of fat people and anyone who wishes to lose weight. The famous 1959 Stunkard/Maclaren-Hume study will tell you that. Go back further, centuries into history and you'll find the same ideas about torturing fat bodies.
Over the centuries, suggested strategies for losing weight have included bitter tonics, bleeding, sea air, amphetamines, Turkish baths, tapeworms, purgatives, low-fat diets, high-fat diets, cinnamon, more sleep, less sleep, and the “vigorous massage of the body with pea-flour.” The Roman emperor Aurelian advised rubbing cloth over body fat to get rid of it....In 1954, a Swedish doctor decided to bypass segments of dogs’ intestinal tracts. He hoped to curtail the time and space that the body had to absorb calories. The animals subsequently lost weight, and a research doctor observed, “This questionable method of controlling obesity will have the necessary experimental foundation.”Nor is there anything new about being supervised by medics whilst starving, the 1959 study was prompted by the failure of those under the supervision of the study's authors.
Barbara Ellen knows the truth-look at the title of her piece, but, she too is wrestling with the surround pressing minds to force what they know into the ob lie mincer. A VLCD is the exactly the same whoever is pushing it. The same doctors warned us off for years, when they'd led to one too many injuries and deaths.
The slimming industry has faded before. The roaring twenties created conditions for commercialised slimming, that died down and came back in the 1960s, when Jean Nidetch came up with weight watchers.
All the while doctors where not only the contrivers and peddlers of all major imprints of eat less/move more, they routinely funnelled their patients to the slimming industry, not seeing it as their business.
It came crashing to earth some time around the 1990s, as people noticed they weren't getting any slimmer despite the efforts they were putting forth. Medics again stepped in to salvage it - health became the overriding emphasis to get people to keep repeating diet failure. Avoidance of death rather than other motives became the excuse.
Currently, the slimming industry is moving away from obvious endorsement of starvation, following the lifestyle line-which wasn't theirs either. Even fat people who had wanted to be slim at any costs learnt it is possible to exhaust your desire for something, if the obstacle in its way is too insurmountable.
Public awareness is the real motor for pushing starvation back into the medical sphere, to try and use that to force people to repeat their failure,
the NHS inadvertently endorsed crash dieting, lending medical authority to something that for so many leads to unsupervised, self-sabotaging, soul-destroying yo-yoing? I’d love to learn in, say, five to 10 years’ time, that this plan to reduce the numbers of British diabetics has proved wildly successful. Sadly, the continuing dominance of the global diet industry suggests otherwise.Its direct not inadvertent, nor does anyone need to sabotage even if they wanted to, dieting fails on its own, it's just the wrong tactic. Try to stay up late by will and the urge to sleep will creep through your body, until it overtakes your body.
Though drugs and mutilation are being added to the weight loss mix, it's unlikely to reverse weight much if at all. Diabetes will probably continue to increase. Incidentally, fatty viscera is associated with weight rebound and triggering diabetes.
Though the evidence is not conclusive-to my knowledge-it is serious enough to warrant settling once and for all. I'm talking of a real standard of evidence, not "seemingly mainly prompted by the results of a rather small trial from a year ago." This is honestly something I've only seen in this area, it is flagrantly unprofessional.
There are at least two pathways, one, the exhaustion of the glucose receptors that tends to occur in the early stage of a CRIWL effort-sometimes referred to as the "water weight" phase and the inducement of metabolic conservation, similar to aspects of hibernation in other mammals.
This "metabolic depression", an excellent way of putting it by the way, is also implicated as a trigger of fatty build up in the viscera;
The NHS plans to help people shed the fat that builds up around internal organs..Visceral fat is an inherent feature of a rare condition called lipodystrophy. People with it have that and other metabolic problems on an unparallelled level and extent to the average target of the crusade.
He* was interested in insulin resistance, the cause of Type 2 diabetes, and had assumed it resulted from obesity. But people with lipodystrophy had the most severe insulin resistance he had ever seen, and they were far from obese.[*Dr. Simeon Taylor, who was the chief of the diabetes branch at the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases]
The pioneering treatment for this turned out to be a discovery of a metabolic feature, Leptin. Discovered under the banner of 'obesity' yes, but dealing with physiological function, as it is. Leptin is a chemical made by the human body. Fat people are said-in the main-to have an abundance of it.
If the most effective reverser of fatty viscera is activating and altering the settings of metabolic features, usually built into the body, then it is more evidence of the body itself as the primary manager of its own metabolic function, which includes weight. Ditto metabolic snafus.
It's a question of accessing those properly and for some reason, the white-coated ones have never really wanted this.
If we the public had not become so pitifully craven in an increasingly feudalistic era, we might realise this is a rare instance of the professionals caught slipping in a way that can be clearly seen by all.
By rights, this should be the moment when they encounter the humbling they've been way too happy to enjoy at our expense. Time and again, their discoveries have challenged and broken some of our most sacred and preciously held beliefs about ourselves and the ways we live. Shaking collective and individual awareness to its core.
We've had to wear it whilst they've mocked us with lofty disdain.
Now its their turn.
For some reason, they cannot get over the failure of starving people, allowing fanatical failed anorexic dietitians et al to have their way with the unwary, whilst the more rational stand in the background allowing and enabling them. It's time for the public, for the lay(wo)man to laugh and point.
To give the white coats a massive well deserved wedgie. Believe me when I say, they need it. Though they'll object, nothing proves this more than their deranged psychotic breakdown over people's size.
In the end it boils down to a test of character. The Emperors are buck naked, with their bits swinging before our eyes. How many of us have the self possession to be that little boy who points this out, refusing to permit ridicule, theirs or their tools to stop us?
On this one, balls in your court Barbara and you are on your own together with the rest of us who cannot pretend we don't know better. Sadly for now, this seems to be too little comfort.
Prove me wrong.
No comments:
Post a Comment